Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
banner
marcusjdl.bsky.social
Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
@marcusjdl.bsky.social
Gay with husband and a dog called Dusty. Left wing due to life experience. Transphobes not welcome. All the man, all the man you need. All hail the people’s republic of Londonistan! he/him. Vote Green

Blog: https://london-whiplash.ghost.io/
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
PSA: twitter, X, is doing new terms of service that basically make it so that any comtent you share on there including DMs and photos is theirs and they can use it for "any purpose" including commercial use.

So, if you have a page you’ve left up and don’t want them there’s time to act 1/
January 7, 2026 at 12:15 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
You know when we said it was a bad idea to put these people in charge of all our NHS data?
Palantir co-founder says it exists to kill communists.
January 6, 2026 at 10:12 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
Fascinating watching people who celebrated the rise to power of an ex-human rights lawyer, as a sign that sensible, law-based politics had returned, now making excuses for their man’s refusal to uphold international law
January 4, 2026 at 3:29 PM
What a cowardly, lily-livered, weak, puppet, white supremacist terrorist regime supporting piece of shit
Keir Starmer: "I constantly remind myself that 24/7 our defence, our security & our intelligent relationship with the US matters probably more than any other relationship we've got in the world and it would not be in our national interest to weaken that in any way"
January 4, 2026 at 6:17 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
I heard Starmer described on the radio yesterday as ‘someone who cares deeply about international law’ and like… he doesn’t appear to, guys?
Keir Starmer: "I constantly remind myself that 24/7 our defence, our security & our intelligent relationship with the US matters probably more than any other relationship we've got in the world and it would not be in our national interest to weaken that in any way"
January 4, 2026 at 11:48 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
How Labour will improve your living standards by Behind A Paywall
January 4, 2026 at 1:58 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
"Left-leaning mothers of Mumsnet are deserting Labour for Reform" [Times]

I can't stop laughing long enough to come up with something sarcastic to say about this headline.
January 4, 2026 at 8:37 AM
Us gingerly opening emails tomorrow and frankly just getting on with it:
-2C by the Union Canal in Edinburgh.
Only a swan could fall through broken ice so gracefully. 🦢
January 4, 2026 at 6:14 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
-2C by the Union Canal in Edinburgh.
Only a swan could fall through broken ice so gracefully. 🦢
January 4, 2026 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
Actually he's convinced me it should be 100%:
- pop market bubbles
- no house price inflation, correction to a homes value in use not as speculative asset
- no tax avoidance by disguised remuneration, entirety of high earnings brought within PAYE
- entirety of billionaire wealth taxable
December 31, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
If you successfully use a big drill during a heist and then get caught you should be given

1) less time on sentance
2) a medal
3) the movie rights.
December 31, 2025 at 10:55 AM
Chris Mason really should be getting far more heat that Laura Kuenssberg used to. We know why he doesn’t but the man is an absolute journalism void so deep in the politics as nerdy spectator sport upholding neoliberalism vortex it’s like an unfunny satire
The deepest analysis of Labour’s woes Chris Mason can offer involves poring over polling %ages, wibbling about comms & halfhearted gestures at y’know, social media & stuff. If you’re after anything about its wildly unpopular policies or strategy of wooing people who hate it, sorry, he’s not your man
Why 2026 is Keir Starmer's make or break year
With devolved elections coming up, questions over Labour’s direction and internal 'campaigning' already underway according to some insiders, where does this all leave the prime minister?
www.bbc.co.uk
December 31, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
The dauphin of Harriet Harman and Jack Dromey, about the same age as Zack Polanski, wants to make it clear that only the grim, grinding, managed decline of death march politics counts as serious.
December 31, 2025 at 8:27 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
GOOD NEWS! Researchers have shown Alzheimer’s disease can be REVERSED- not just prevented. Using a potent neuroprotective compound called P7C3-A20, they found RESTORING balance to a central cellular energy molecule (NAD+) not only PREVENTED disease features but REVERSED them, EVEN at late stages.
December 28, 2025 at 5:00 PM
He is? LMAOOOO

The UK in a nutshell
Harriet Harman's son. Says it all
December 31, 2025 at 10:16 AM
Reform: we want to deport british citizens because they are Black or Asian and take away human rights
Greens: maybe a wealth tax, less racism and owning public services

Incredibly clever head of the “Fabians” - these two things are the same
BREAKING: Head of the 'Sabotage the left' club doesn't like left-wing movement.
December 31, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
BREAKING: Head of the 'Sabotage the left' club doesn't like left-wing movement.
December 31, 2025 at 7:16 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
You might be forgiven for thinking this was self-evident in 2024 but the lads decided it was Labour's turn anyway
Can't do much better than this really. A more interesting question is why people find it surprising.
December 31, 2025 at 10:02 AM
Now we’re cooking!

My concession is that capital gains tax should be the same rate as earned income.
yes, ok..stick up inheritance tax to 100%. I reckon the public would love that. And stick up capital gains tax to 100%, I reckon that will really help with growth.
December 31, 2025 at 9:59 AM
LMAO are you a) a bot b) incredibly ignorant
So mostly stuff that didn’t happen cool
December 31, 2025 at 9:57 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
The police added "we thought the giant hole was part of the air conditioning"
December 31, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
With replies like “all we’re hearing is that we should hate Starmer but I can’t see a reason why we should” from obvious Labour bots, and comments disabled, I can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t be a government cheerleader. (/s)
December 31, 2025 at 9:46 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
There are a lot of compelling explanations for this, from support for genocide, to continuing the Tories political project while promising change and promoting bigotry. Ultimately though the best explanation is to just walk around the UK and ask “Is it getting any better?”
Glad the FT is asking the question. Even if I’m not convinced they found a compelling answer.
I get that Starmer & Reeves are unpopular, I really don’t understand the extent of the dislike.

www.ft.com/content/1995... ‘There’s a real dislike, even loathing’: why voters hate Starmer and Reeves
‘There’s a real dislike, even loathing’: why voters hate Starmer and Reeves
Allies concede the prime minister and chancellor have made mistakes yet the level of disdain towards them is still striking
www.ft.com
December 31, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
Is it hard to understand ? Starmer suffers the same problems that led to to 'Pasokification' across Europe, claiming to offer 'change' but doing continuity centrism instead , and because he did so by lying +attacking his own party , doesn't even have a base of his own to counterbalance attacks
December 31, 2025 at 9:03 AM
Reposted by Marcus 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧
Most journalists take it as a given that the public are universally racist and transphobic, and try to cast any pushback to racist and transphobic policies as “extremist”. They can’t comprehend that a significant proportion of the population might be opposed to these things
December 31, 2025 at 9:31 AM