David Spurrett
@doctorspurt.bsky.social
1.8K followers 1.3K following 590 posts

Philosopher, working on evolution of mechanisms of action selection, and their variously situated subversion. https://davidspurrett.com/

Philosophy 23%
Psychology 21%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
doctorspurt.bsky.social
Hello new followers. I'm a philosopher of cognitive science working on a book called 'Engines of Hostility'. Recent papers that inform the book are:
(1) "Hostile Scaffolding" (Timms & Spurrett)
(2) "Fashioning Affordances" (Spurrett & Brancazio)
(3) "On Hostile and Oppressive Affective Technology."
jeremymberg.bsky.social
I have been trying to get this published as an op-ed, but I am going to post it here since I think it is timely in light of the "consent" extortion events.

Deafening Quiet from the Scientific Establishment

jeremymberg.github.io/jeremyberg.g...

1/14
jeremymberg.github.io
estherschindler.bsky.social
I just saw someone use the abbreviation “AI;DR” and I’ll be laughing for a while.
chadbourn.bsky.social
Palantir has pulled out of involvement with the UK Digital ID card, according to an interview with their UK CEO on Times Radio. They’re concerned about the reputational damage of being involved with an unpopular Starmer policy.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think Kevin's worry (or part of it) is that designers without addiction related intention might amplify/create addiction while trying to 'improve design'. I think that probably does happen sometimes. And design can generate non-addiction bad stuff (like junk and 'ultraprocessed' food).

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Also worth noting (social media feeds come up a lot among the replies) that (a) it is sometimes the same designers (gambling machine designers are UI designers for hire, and executives move between companies, or companies operate in both markets) and (b) the very same inventions/patents get adopted.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
A lot of tech bros who were upset about pronouns want to confer them on their computers now that they’re dating
cjdenial.bsky.social
Can we stop calling an artificial representation of a person by a human-coded name? "She" does not exist. "She" is a reflection of someone's ingenue dreams, but "she" is pixels and code.
opinion.bloomberg.com
Tilly Norwood raises the question of who will be the first to win an Oscar for best AI in a leading role

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think casinos and gambling machine designers know very well that addicts are their most profitable users. (Like oil companies are aware of the consequences of their business model.) Not saying all addiction amplifiers are knowing, mind you.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Some 'design' is dumb luck. Flue-curing of bright leaf tobacco made lung inhalation possible. Possibly the biggest single factor in the addictiveness of cigarettes. But they were "trying" to reduce fire loss in curing. If "designed to" is about intention, not all addiction amplifiers are intended.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think there sometimes is, because some designers know that their product is addictive, and are trying to enhance that. The documents revealed in the course of litigation against cigarette companies showed that, as does Schüll's work on gambling ("Addicted by Design").

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I don't think that we should allow that anything can be addictive. (Clean air? Safe drinking water? Cabbage? Public libraries? Toothbrushes? Pedestrian crossings?)

doctorspurt.bsky.social
For more direct answers, I'd suggest @don-rosseconomist.bsky.social "Addiction is socially engineered exploitation of natural biological vulnerability" (2020) or the Glackin, Roberts, Krueger "Out of our heads: Addiction and psychiatric externalism" (2021) both in Behavioral Brain Research.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Re 'scientific', it's sometimes tricky because at least two centres of gravity are in play, one being empirical coherence (in neuroscience, psychiatry, etc.) and another being more overtly normative (guiding public health, policy formation).

doctorspurt.bsky.social
A clear contrast case is lowering price and/or improving functionality of beneficial infrastructure, like public transport, where resulting increased use (due to more & better routes, improved accessibility, lower prices) has no harms/downside, or withdrawal, or conflict over use.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Not synonyms, I think, even if a difference of degree. Addictive consumption is associated with strong motivation despite harms, difficulty stopping even when motivated to, withdrawal symptoms on stopping, etc. Many design changes can lead to increased use without going there.
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Matthew 15:29-31: And great crowds came to him, bringing with them the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute, and many others, and they put them at his feet, and he healed them after verifying their citizenship status.

scurry.bsky.social
I am so dismayed a the statement today from the President of the @royalsociety.org that I want to publish here the letter I wrote to him yesterday urging him to address the clear concerns of the UK scientific community.
Screenshot of first part of letter (continues in next image). Text reads: 

Dear Sir Adrian

I write to request that in its deliberations tomorrow the Council resolves to take a principled stand to defend the scientific values written into its code of conduct. 

In its attempts to deal with the actions of Elon Musk FRS, the Royal Society has repeatedly failed to explain how his repudiation of those values is consistent with the code of conduct that all Fellows must adhere to as a condition of their fellowship. As is now well established, these actions include attacking Antony Fauci FRS without good cause; spreading scientific misinformation on X [through his own utterances and by relaxing controls on the platform]; recklessly and unlawfully degrading the research ecosystem of the US as part of DOGE; and bragging publicly about "feeding USAID into the wood chipper", which the Lancet estimates will cause the deaths of 14 million people, many of them children under the age of five, by 2030. 

The Society’s inaction extends to the recent brief exchange of correspondence between Prof Sir Paul Nurse and Mr Musk. Although there was some initial contact, when Sir Paul laid out the Society’s specific concerns there was no reply or explanation from Musk. For reasons that I’m afraid I cannot fathom, you chose once again not to enforce your code of conduct. 
Screenshot of letter. Text continues: 

"You will be aware that the sense of bewildered dismay over this affair is shared by Royal Society Fellows, medallists and journals editors, and many thousands within the scientific community here and abroad. The Royal Society still claims to speak for scientists in the UK, but on this vital issue, its inaction represents an inexplicable rupture with values that our community holds very dear. 

In all this my primary concern is has been for the good standing of the Royal Society as the UK’s national academy. As I am sure you understand all too well (given your recent remarks in the wake of Mr Musk’s ill-judged speech at the Tommy Robinson rally), the country, the world at large, and the very practice of science itself face severe challenges from technologies and populist politics that foment division and ignorance. In such troubled times, people look to our established institutions to have the courage to stand by long-held values of truth and decency. 

It is my sincere hope the Royal Society will demonstrate tomorrow that it is just such an institution. 

Yours faithfully, 

Stephen"
davidjbier.bsky.social
ICE lied about the person it shot, claiming he was a "criminal," but NBC finds that he had no criminal history whatsoever. Not even traffic tickets in 12 years! It also lied about the extent of the injuries to its agents....
bencollins.bsky.social
Just gonna keep tapping the sign*

*𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

Reposted by David Spurrett

Reposted by David Spurrett

wardqnormal.bsky.social
Coal.

Sure, it destroys the environment, contributes to climate change, and kills the people who mine it, but on the other hand it's also much more expensive than cleaner sources of energy.

Definitely agree we need to get back to it.
mpaarlberg.bsky.social
I think the Trump admin assumed no one would try to find out who the people on the boats they blew up really were
nkalamb.bsky.social
Cornell is cancelling a distinguished professor's classes on Gaza and suspending him because of the complaints of a student who previously served in Israel's military surveillance agency and was literally recording the comments of other students in class and deliberately derailing discussion.
Early last semester, Droubi said, students began approaching Cheyfitz with complaints that a graduate student in the “Gaza, Indigeneity, Resistance” class appeared to be recording them, possibly to “gather their names and comments” and intimidate them. “We believe that a student came to the course for the sole reason of surveilling and potentially harming students in the class,” Droubi said. “That ended up proving itself to be true because multiple students came forward and shared their concerns with Professor Cheyfitz.” Cheyfitz said one Palestinian student quit the class after telling him she felt upset and frightened.

Current Issue
Cover of October 2025 Issue
October 2025 Issue
According to Cheyfitz, the graduate student often steered conversations away from the assigned readings—which at that point mostly focused on definitions of genocide and international law on Indigenous rights—to defend Israel’s conduct in the war in Gaza and argue with others in the class. “He clearly had not done the readings,” Cheyfitz said. “It was disruptive.”

Cheyfitz said he met with the graduate student in late January and spoke to him about concerns from his classmates. During the conversation, he asked the graduate student to drop the course, and by the next class, he did, Cheyfitz said. The graduate student, Oren Renard, a PhD candidate in computer science whose identity was confirmed by other students in the class, previously served in Israel’s elite military surveillance agency, Unit 8200, according to his LinkedIn profile.
tanjabueltmann.net
When I was a teenager there was a bus direct from my hometown in Germany to London - we had a British army base, and this direct bus connection was one of the benefits of that. One summer I went on that bus to go volunteer in an old people's home in Southend-on-Sea. I had just turned 18 and was... 🧵

doctorspurt.bsky.social
If you've been waiting -- perhaps without knowing it yourself -- for a piece with "The epistemic dangers of wank" as a sub-heading, here you go.
iris-meredith.bsky.social
Today's article is about a form of bad-faith speech somewhat akin to bullshit, which I'm calling (because why not) wank. I don't quite think I've focused the ideas down as much as I can, but I think it says some interesting things regardless:
An essay on wank | deadSimpleTech
This captures well the uncomfortable, slightly disorienting feeling that wank creates when you're subjected to it, wherein you're expected to speak about and think about the statement as though it say...
deadsimpletech.com