Pronouns: he/him
Read the full article AND support our hi-jinx on Patreon: www.patreon.com/posts/136382...
yeah that's true of pretty much all of them.
yeah that's true of pretty much all of them.
www.lbc.co.uk/article/met-...
"Roofs, even sturdy metal ones, were left pockmarked and perforated after 3-inch balls of ice fell from the sky. 'It was nuts,' he recalls. There were baseball-sized holes in the lawn, even. 'I’d never seen that before.'"
www.wired.com/story/it-was...
"Roofs, even sturdy metal ones, were left pockmarked and perforated after 3-inch balls of ice fell from the sky. 'It was nuts,' he recalls. There were baseball-sized holes in the lawn, even. 'I’d never seen that before.'"
www.wired.com/story/it-was...
Like... why is it a good thing to have had sex? why is it a bad thing to not have had sex? and do these norms have any negative effects we should be concerned about? (yes)
Like... why is it a good thing to have had sex? why is it a bad thing to not have had sex? and do these norms have any negative effects we should be concerned about? (yes)
If you're acknowledging their existence at all you've basically already lost because the whole game for them is to get noticed and hold your attention.
The whole game.
If you're acknowledging their existence at all you've basically already lost because the whole game for them is to get noticed and hold your attention.
The whole game.
finally, lame middle-aged left-wing parents have a candidate we can see ourselves in
finally, lame middle-aged left-wing parents have a candidate we can see ourselves in
now it basically has no meaning.
now it basically has no meaning.
That's why they tried to avoid publishing this.
That's why they tried to avoid publishing this.
1. This does not mean the policy is illegal! The Equality Act does not stop govt doing things that hurt people with protected characteristics. It just requires them to justify that by reference to other policy objectives -here reducing net migration.
1. This does not mean the policy is illegal! The Equality Act does not stop govt doing things that hurt people with protected characteristics. It just requires them to justify that by reference to other policy objectives -here reducing net migration.
Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
The judgement states outright that the evidence submitted by her & Sex Matters was “not skilled evidence.”
This is the Tribunal’s exact wording!
The judgement states outright that the evidence submitted by her & Sex Matters was “not skilled evidence.”
This is the Tribunal’s exact wording!
• Not skilled evidence
• Not expert
• Not impartial
• Not reliable
• Polemic rather than evidence
• Material that could not support findings of fact
So why are UK news media & politicians listening to them!!??
• Not skilled evidence
• Not expert
• Not impartial
• Not reliable
• Polemic rather than evidence
• Material that could not support findings of fact
So why are UK news media & politicians listening to them!!??
Who you vote for makes a huge difference to the lives of thousands of people you'll never meet, and that applies at every level of government.
Who you vote for makes a huge difference to the lives of thousands of people you'll never meet, and that applies at every level of government.