Jane Green
banner
profjanegreen.bsky.social
Jane Green
@profjanegreen.bsky.social

Nuffield College, Oxford
Co-Director, British Election Study
Director, Nuffield Politics Research Centre
President, British Polling Council
Voting, surveys, explanation, singing …

Jane Green FAcSS is a British political scientist and academic. She is Professor of Political Science and British Politics at the University of Oxford and a professorial fellow of Nuffield College. She is a specialist in public opinion and electoral behaviour, and has co-directed the British Election Study. She is the president of the British Polling Council. .. more

Political science 77%
Economics 5%

Unless all the Reform-leaning voters of the constituency are online or GB News fans (which they surely won't be), I think his credentials are alienating.

Smaller swing than we’d otherwise expect

Not because Matt is saying stuff about Mary Beard but because he feels he has to say stuff about Mary Beard. I.e. dealing with what he’s best known for.
Again, I think Reform could very likely under-perform in this by-election.
Interesting that the book writing politics professor has pivoted to Anti-Nerd while running for Reform. Absolutely no reason for drive by on MARY GODDAMN BEARD unless you want to oppose thought and nuance. She's been on Top Gear! #teammary

Again, I think Reform could very likely under-perform in this by-election.
Interesting that the book writing politics professor has pivoted to Anti-Nerd while running for Reform. Absolutely no reason for drive by on MARY GODDAMN BEARD unless you want to oppose thought and nuance. She's been on Top Gear! #teammary
You dont win 'em all! Reform's Matt Goodwin in Sunday Times: 'Most .. people criticising me are nerds.The last thing I want is to be at some dinner party table with Nick Robinson & Mary Beard. I'd rather shoot myself in the head'. Hang on, I'm not THAT bad!Nerds sometimes have a (thoughtful!) point.
Academics vying for a spot in Epstein‘s world. There are so many. I feel the need to make a thread, so I don’t keep confusing them. 1/

Is this true?! If so, purely on politics, surely Reform would know that such a candidate may backfire for this type of race. Unless Matt has some local, deeply committed credentials I admit I am unaware of?
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.

So, vaugely academic Labour blueskiers (and, hell, non-academic ones) fancy a trip to Gorton to Stop Goodwin?
Are you an academic already alarmed and upset by the prospect of Matt Goodwin MP?

Just think! If Reform wins the next general election, they'll probably make him higher education minister.

Reposted by Jane Green

If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.

So, vaugely academic Labour blueskiers (and, hell, non-academic ones) fancy a trip to Gorton to Stop Goodwin?
Are you an academic already alarmed and upset by the prospect of Matt Goodwin MP?

Just think! If Reform wins the next general election, they'll probably make him higher education minister.
The people of Minnesota have executed one of the most impressive civil resistance campaigns I can remember:

- Organized a city wide general strike
- Maintained nonviolent discipline amidst violence
- Mobilized 10,000s in subzero temps to protest and watch ICE
- Flipped public opinion against ICE

I hope people remember these protests, and all the food parcels and practical support being provided through churches, when otherwise pointing to white evangelical Republicanism in (understandable) consternation for its support of Trump.
I’m not much for religion but if I were, if a line of clergy flew in to freezing weather to line up and oppose me while singing songs of faith, I might be thinking “are we the baddies?”
I’m not much for religion but if I were, if a line of clergy flew in to freezing weather to line up and oppose me while singing songs of faith, I might be thinking “are we the baddies?”

I don't think a new/increased one, unless it were to become politicised. Perhaps a bit more hesitation to jump among Conservatives.

I’ll be looking for UK Trump approval pre-post January but I have seen the impact of the last week be so anxiety-inducing and so horrifying for so many ‘normal’ (non-political) people I know, who never comment on politics, plus admiration for Carney, it shouldn’t be underestimated politically.

Sickening beyond belief.
Russia says President Putin has been invited to join Trump’s Board of Peace for Gaza.

Astonishing to invite one of history’s most egregious warmongers on to a peace board. The international rules are already in the bin.
Russia says President Putin has been invited to join Trump’s Board of Peace for Gaza.

Astonishing to invite one of history’s most egregious warmongers on to a peace board. The international rules are already in the bin.

Reposted by Will Jennings

What we know is that we’re entering a period of intense geopolitical turmoil. Shocks that will also reshape domestic politics. Different issues may matter to voters, different qualities, and different political responses. Which all means 2026 is very risky to place bets now (for defectors).
It’s by no means impossible that Reform could fall back somewhat in the polls and be overtaken by the Conservatives - at which point it will be fascinating/priceless to watch the response of all the defectors.
It’s by no means impossible that Reform could fall back somewhat in the polls and be overtaken by the Conservatives - at which point it will be fascinating/priceless to watch the response of all the defectors.

It would be on a renewable basis. I think they want to provide continuity to the team (a good thing).

we don't understand the propensity for parties to reach non-voters at the moment, or how people now consider the trade-offs of voting for nationally viable parties but don't know if they're viable locally, and ..... (I should go for some wine)

I feel we have bigger fish to fry. Such as, imo, one of the most important things right now isn't measured well (whether people think parties have a clear purpose/what parties stand for, and what is that), and there's too much in polls in the 'don't knows', and we may be underestimating Reform, and

There's a debate about PTVs and like-dislikes and whether they're functionally equivalent. But yes, someone who thinks they're not could indeed combine them! We had this in mind when we did a split-half solution in the BES (tried to find a win-win).

Ours is just a propensity to vote score, where some people say 'not over my dead body' (though still sometimes do) as 0, and then everyone else is distributed somewhere on the scale. Maybe next time you can tell us what you'd do!

I apologise for the PTSD ;-)

Ha! Not sure how to respond to this one. You can smooth things and lose info, or make them 'obnoxious', I guess!

Reposted by Tim Bale

We think (in work w/@martamiori.bsky.social) viability is the name of the game! How voters make sense of which party in their bloc can defeat a party in the other.

The big question: how voters make sense of this in our electoral system, whether there is a return to the major parties because of it.
And surely helps Reform demonstrate 'viability', which as Jane sets out in this great piece is so important to them now:

Reposted by Jane Green

And surely helps Reform demonstrate 'viability', which as Jane sets out in this great piece is so important to them now:

This week, yes!

Have we seen a loss of votes to further right? (A very difficult thing to measure …)

Except this realism is anything but boring for Reform! You have to hand it to them...(but I understand why some people just can't bring themselves to do that, but priors are priors)

Reposted by Jane Green

99 per cent of analysis I’m reading about Zahawi is way too involved. To the extent people pay attention to this at all, it will be to note that Reform are doing well and hear someone else say Farage will/can be PM. Also: are Reform the same old Tories or something new and scary?