Jane Green
banner
profjanegreen.bsky.social
Jane Green
@profjanegreen.bsky.social

Nuffield College, Oxford
Co-Director, British Election Study
Director, Nuffield Politics Research Centre
President, British Polling Council
Voting, surveys, explanation, singing …

Jane Green FAcSS is a British political scientist and academic. She is Professor of Political Science and British Politics at the University of Oxford and a professorial fellow of Nuffield College. She is a specialist in public opinion and electoral behaviour, and has co-directed the British Election Study. She is the president of the British Polling Council. .. more

Political science 77%
Economics 5%
My parent’s local A&E doesn’t have pillows, time, beds, capacity. The GP doesn’t have emergency appointments for emergencies, services with capacity to refer people to.

Caring like this about nomenclature and pronouns seems to me a luxury pursuit, frankly.
Susan Hall's condition has now reached the 'shouting at biscuits' stage.
Susan Hall's condition has now reached the 'shouting at biscuits' stage.

Agree

But plenty of evidence (halving of vote in first year) that the strategy is not working so far.
Precisely. If you are losing 20-25% of your vote to your left as well (which Labour are) then even with the double-counting problem with Reform that’s equally bad. There are no easy answers to this but we have no evidence that the current strategy is actually working.

But the point of our piece is that this is the issue happening everywhere. Labour losing votes to the left and undecided lowers the bar for Reform who are mainly capturing Conservatives.

Reposted by Jane Green

Precisely. If you are losing 20-25% of your vote to your left as well (which Labour are) then even with the double-counting problem with Reform that’s equally bad. There are no easy answers to this but we have no evidence that the current strategy is actually working.

I wouldn’t want to be too precise on exactly 12% but the double count is the issue Labour is concerned about. However, bigger total losses elsewhere are a bigger or as big a problem because they lower the bar for Reform to overtake Labour, if Reform take more votes from Tories (as they’re doing).

Violin. I hope perhaps it wired my brain in a useful way but otherwise completely redundant.

tiny numbers though

We found this. It’s on the Nuffield Politics Research Centre website….

Inflation falls, of course prices still keep going up on top of a painfully high level….

The public also do not see them as the same thing. We see much closer correspondence between answers about ‘prices’ and other evals compared to ‘inflation’.
A thought. In 2022-24 incumbents did terribly everywhere and the most common explanation was voters hating inflation.
Today inflation is much lower. And Merz, Starmer & Trump are all deeply unpopular.
He's done it! Merz is now less popular than Olaf Scholz at his lowest low.

Nobody could have predicted this, of course. www.n-tv.de/politik/Kanz...
A thought. In 2022-24 incumbents did terribly everywhere and the most common explanation was voters hating inflation.
Today inflation is much lower. And Merz, Starmer & Trump are all deeply unpopular.

I popped up briefly on @itvnews.bsky.social News at Ten last night in relation to the "Budget Shenanigans" and public trust (and people being, more importantly, worried about their finances):

youtu.be/-56hNi57O94?...
Prime Minister defends Rachel Reeves as OBR Chair resigns - Watch ITV News at Ten
YouTube video by ITV News In Full
youtu.be

Not here; I’m definitely stuck in the past in my writing.
All this budget news, claims, counter claims is confusing, but two things of consequence.

1. We're all talking about that, not any financial benefits (or losses) of the budget.

2. Yet more focus on the very weird few weeks and politics of it all. Starting to feel dangerously like a norm.
PhD opportunity at the University of Oxford. The Morelli scholarship funds a doctoral student to work with me on on democratic backsliding, strategies of democratic defense and regeneration, or the rise of illiberalism. Deadline Jan 9. More information at users.ox.ac.uk/~ssfc0073/

Yes of course. Will do

Its really strange. And a very weird reading of public opinion too. There are multiple reasons to win elections. Being clear about what you stand for, expressing values, delivery, unity in parliament, not just 'following poll X' !!
It's part of the electionification of everything, which is why we as a country are failing to have a proper conversation about our actual problems. It's bad for the left *and* the right.
It's such a bizarre framing. Labour MPs think taking 450k kids out of poverty is putting the country first! That's why they wanted it to happen! It's not because they personally benefit.

And 2017 beneath the surface too (the patterns of demographic association). But yes, the main thing was that 2024 was a return to a previous trend, but Labour's massive majority confused people quite a bit in that regard.
UK politics followers, these graphs are in a paper by @jamesdgriffiths.bsky.social and co (inc. me).

There's so much useful info in them.

The long-term context for the politics of our time, how the 'Brexit elections' differed, though note the Y axes may need to be bigger for the next election!!
It's part of the electionification of everything, which is why we as a country are failing to have a proper conversation about our actual problems. It's bad for the left *and* the right.
It's such a bizarre framing. Labour MPs think taking 450k kids out of poverty is putting the country first! That's why they wanted it to happen! It's not because they personally benefit.
Headline on The World at One just now:

"Sir Keir Starmer has denied putting the Labour Party before the country by ending the two-child benefit cap".

Can we please go back to reporting the actual news, not someone's partisan take on it?

Yes, indeed. Labour also has a problem of coming into power and doing un-Labour things. Consider the winter fuel cut and disability benefits cuts. This may reassure some of Labour's 2024 supporters, which is where Labour has been losing most of its support. I think its a more symbolic step.

The two-child limit lift should be a celebration moment for people who really do care about the working class and are motivated for politics to protect those really left-behind in society. Extremely telling when it isn't!!

Noticeable that energy bill support coming in 2026, a lot of the pain deferred to much closer to a general election (or even after?). Labour has got the message on households needing improvements now, but its not much!

Seems, as ever, like a lot of pain for households deferred for political reasons - a tight balancing act because the market reaction (which wants reassurance sooner) is also politically important given the need for econ optimism and perceptions of competence, as much as its economically important.

Rachel Reeves blames the Tories for the poor economic context, but its Labour that's now losing voters due to feelings of economic insecurity, financial worries, with around a third of people feeling these heightened concerns, according to our surveys.

This was a long form interview about our new research by the fantastic @adamfleming.bsky.social where I tried to summarise the findings - and their political implications - as simply as possible in 'talking human, not academic' form:
🎙️ "Those economic worries are critical. They matter across the board, they matter in magnitude and they're having a number of indirect effects."

@profjanegreen.bsky.social discusses @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social latest report on Newscast last night. Starts at 23mins.

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...
Newscast - Another Trump Ukraine Peace Plan - BBC Sounds
Trump hints at 'big progress' in Ukraine talks.
www.bbc.co.uk

Yeah, if that’s dancing….