Valerie Hans
banner
jurygirl.bsky.social
Valerie Hans
@jurygirl.bsky.social

Cornell Law School professor working on torts, psychology & law, jury decision-making. Fan of Eagles, Steelers & Niners, which makes some games difficult.

Valerie Hans is an American legal scholar and psychologist. She is the Charles F. Rechlin Professor of Law at Cornell Law School and has been the editor of the Annual Review of Law and Social Science. Trained as a social scientist, her major areas of study are the jury system, jury reform, and the application of social science to law. .. more

Law 64%
Economics 12%

The anti-Eagles coverage on ESPN is outrageous! πŸ¦… Go Birds even if Troy Aikman diminishes you at every opportunity.

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

Kansas City is happy to welcome you for the World Cup. I need to practice the languages of all our visitors like Dutch, Arabic, and more, but know all are welcome. We will see you this summer in Kansas City!

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΌπŸ‡ΉπŸ‡³πŸ‡³πŸ‡±πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή!!!

Mike, kudos to you for teaching our students (and the rest of us) about Con Law in the News! Such an important contribution!
For years, I've begun each day of Constitutional Law with "Con Law in the News." It has been a semester like no other. Trump's transformation of the US into a racist and lawless authoritarian regime has provided a cornucopia of material for my class. I'll almost miss him if he ever leaves office. πŸ‘‡
Teaching Constitutional Law During the Second (and Hopefully Final) Trump Administration
For many years now, I have started just about every day of my first-semester-first-year Constitutional Law class with 5-10 minutes of "Con L...
www.dorfonlaw.org
For years, I've begun each day of Constitutional Law with "Con Law in the News." It has been a semester like no other. Trump's transformation of the US into a racist and lawless authoritarian regime has provided a cornucopia of material for my class. I'll almost miss him if he ever leaves office. πŸ‘‡
Teaching Constitutional Law During the Second (and Hopefully Final) Trump Administration
For many years now, I have started just about every day of my first-semester-first-year Constitutional Law class with 5-10 minutes of "Con L...
www.dorfonlaw.org

One other benefit; research shows that serving on a jury increases a person's likelihood of engaging in other civic activities. So it strengthens democracy! Especially important now.

In the US we leave it up to the judges themselves to decide whether they are biased. Rarely happens!

Great points!

Judges are human! Of course they experience bias. The selection process of jurors and the group nature of the verdict help to limit jury bias.

Excellent article explaining why restricting jury trials is exactly the wrong thing to do in this moment when democracy is threatened.
"The reason trial by jury is so important is also the reason the authorities seek to restrict them: juries can think independently"

Jenrick has already pledged that a Tory govt would reverse 'Blair-era changes' that restrict ministerial involvement in judicial appointments.
β€œCutting ordinary people out of the judicial system, weakening the scope of jury trials, and leaning even more upon magistrates and judges, will reinforce a more technocratic system and only deepen public mistrust.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column: observer.co.uk/news/columni...

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

"The reason trial by jury is so important is also the reason the authorities seek to restrict them: juries can think independently"

Jenrick has already pledged that a Tory govt would reverse 'Blair-era changes' that restrict ministerial involvement in judicial appointments.
β€œCutting ordinary people out of the judicial system, weakening the scope of jury trials, and leaning even more upon magistrates and judges, will reinforce a more technocratic system and only deepen public mistrust.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column: observer.co.uk/news/columni...
Defending trial by jury is crucial in a society where democracy is being eroded | The Observer
observer.co.uk

Good luck I hope you get to serve!

Adequate funding for the courts

Worrisome. And grand juries don't hear from a judge or the defense. To make the grand jury an effective counter to prosecutorial overreach, we need to educate them about their power and consider appointing them a legal advisor.

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

Again, we are at a point in history where β€œnot getting political/partisan” means that you are choosing the side of the oppressor. It is not extremist to use your voice/platform to say β€œhey, actually immigrants make our nation better and the president’s edicts are unAmerican and not the law.” 3/x

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

🚨Trial by jury is a cornerstone of our democracy and an essential safeguard against authoritarianism. We must come together - cross party - to stop any attempt by the government to undermine this fundamental freedom
youtu.be/QdD9LaAN19A?...
Trial by jury is a cornerstone of our democracy - We must fight any attempt to undermine it
YouTube video by Peter Stefanovic
youtu.be

Juries were designed as protection against government overreach. Made for this moment!
It’s not juries that are causing the decay in court buildings, the delay in court cases, the low pay of criminal lawyers, the shambles in court IT. Juries are the citizens’ protection against judicial and legislative over-reach.

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

It’s not juries that are causing the decay in court buildings, the delay in court cases, the low pay of criminal lawyers, the shambles in court IT. Juries are the citizens’ protection against judicial and legislative over-reach.

Really interesting article, thanks for writing it. I'm gonna share it with my students in social science in law.

Reposted by Valerie P. Hans

I have a new piece up at @msnownews.bsky.social, on the recent NJ supreme court case banning shaking baby syndrome evidence, using it to discuss both the generally shoddy nature of all forensic evidence but also the legal profession's on-going refusal to confront our current data-driven world.
Opinion | New Jersey's ban on 'shaken baby syndrome' claims in court points up a larger problem in the legal system
John Pfaff: The state Supreme Court ruling underscores how thin empirical support is for much of the forensic evidence used in criminal cases.
www.ms.now

Take care!

Perfect for Torts class, @alahav.bsky.social !

Agree! Urgent

So true. He loved the Eagles losing

Go Birds πŸ¦…

Agree!

Hilarious responses!

Is it possible to have too many books??

Enjoy the follows!