Josh Pasek
banner
joshpasek.com
Josh Pasek
@joshpasek.com

Prof of Comm & Media and Polisci @Umich studying how people get and use political information and social measurement.
Skills/competencies: data sci, DIY solar, election analytics, carpooling, #polcom, #polpsych, survey methods, AI (views are my own) .. more

Political science 40%
Communication & Media Studies 23%
The Center for American Political History, Media, and Technology (CAPT) at Purdue University is currently searching for a Postdoctoral Research Associate! The deadline to apply is Dec. 31, 2025. More information about the position is available here: careers.purdue.edu/job/Postdoct...
#commsky
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Postdoctoral Research Associate
careers.purdue.edu
My @nytimes.com op-ed: The Boomers Are Protesting Trump. Where Is Gen Z? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/24/o... (gift link)

The key point: "The absence of young people from conventional protests is both a problem and a warning."
Opinion | The Boomers Are Protesting Trump. Where Is Gen Z?
www.nytimes.com

This is the correct take, but the size of a turkey and the potential for uneven cooking means that many common methods simply aren’t capable of rendering a good one.
The President of the United States just called for Democratic members of Congress to be executed. "HANG THEM", he posted.

If you're a person of influence in this country and you haven't picked a side, maybe now would be the time to pick a fucking side.

My parlor game right now is trying to predict which one will end up being Robespierre.
come work with us! @bluelabs.bsky.social is hiring a survey scientist. we're looking for someone who loves working with survey data and wants to solve tricky problems facing the polling industry. please share widely!

job-boards.greenhouse.io/bluelabsanal...
Survey Scientist
Remote or Washington D.C.
job-boards.greenhouse.io

Many of these are reasonable too, but the term limits on members of Congress one turns out to be a really bad idea given the research.
instead of saying this was good strategy, maybe senate dems should say: "the republicans were going to kill people by starving them to death, and because we aren't monsters, we decided to let this fight go. We'll keep fighting. Stop electing monsters."

As a note, the survey is still in the field, but we presented these preliminary results today at the Provost's Seminar on Teaching.

These results echo longstanding findings that students overestimate drinking and sex among their peers and can actually conform to their own misestimations.

The implication is that if instructors could make norms clear, they could massively tamp down on misuse!

Preliminary data from @umich.edu survey on student AI use for class.

Most rarely/sometimes use AI & always follow class policies, but think others frequently use AI & only sometimes follow policies.

Perceptions of misuse ≠ reality

Misperceptions may provide implicit permission for misuse.
I’m not sure the benefits outweigh the costs, but this is a reasonable case that there are benefits to ending the shutdown.
I will probably get excommunicated from Bsky for saying that, but I can see a case for ending the shutdown now.

- Millions of civil servants did not get a salary for over a month, and millions are losing SNAP going into the holiday season.

- But, just as important...

So, has anyone read enough to know if the sandwich actually had mustard and onions?

This is what we find in the polling data, it’s the biggest source of the polling errors that are hard to correct for, and the shifts around the edges of partisanship are slow.
How can these two seemingly contradictory things about US politics both be true?

1. Partisanship is calcified.
2. Election outcomes are thermostatic.

TURNOUT. It’s not the same people who vote every time. Mobilizing, organizing, educating, party infrastructure—it all matters.
How can these two seemingly contradictory things about US politics both be true?

1. Partisanship is calcified.
2. Election outcomes are thermostatic.

TURNOUT. It’s not the same people who vote every time. Mobilizing, organizing, educating, party infrastructure—it all matters.

::breathes a sigh of relief::

I had said this was probably the case the a reporter, but didn't have any numbers to back it up.

I'll add:

Bowling Alone (Putnam)
The strength of weak ties (Granovetter)

But the actual impact often gets massively oversimplified.

The problem is that the empirics are incapable of giving an answer.

Everything in this environment is so multicollinear and bidirectionally caused that teasing it out is not fully possible.

At the end of the day, we’re all parsing identification signals far weaker than the errors in the data.

Good description here of why “pro-semitism” and Christian Zionism are both really antisemitic.

And the crazy brewing fight between the Christian Zionists and the wannabe Nazis.
Oh this is a GOOD write-up.

Basically some Christian Nationalist freaks need Israel to exist for their apocalypse to happen

And so Tucker interviewing Fuentes (and Heritage defending it) is threatening to that because that prophecy cannot afford for Nazis to get their wish re: Jews
This might actually be THE point where Christian Nationalism starts either splintering...or the NAR literally just joins with Christian Identity and REALLY returns to its roots

(I'd have thought the SBC/NAR widening split would have been the fissure, but a neo-Nazi/NAR split has been growing)

1/x

Reposted by Josh Pasek

Oh this is a GOOD write-up.

Basically some Christian Nationalist freaks need Israel to exist for their apocalypse to happen

And so Tucker interviewing Fuentes (and Heritage defending it) is threatening to that because that prophecy cannot afford for Nazis to get their wish re: Jews
This might actually be THE point where Christian Nationalism starts either splintering...or the NAR literally just joins with Christian Identity and REALLY returns to its roots

(I'd have thought the SBC/NAR widening split would have been the fissure, but a neo-Nazi/NAR split has been growing)

1/x
1. A watershed moment.

The President of the Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action, Kevin Roberts , has announced that the organization is standing by Tucker Carlson in the aftermath of Tucker’s interview with neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes.

This isn’t Kevin bending his knee to Trump…this is something new

Reposted by Josh Pasek

Really good reminder that the problem isn't that Democrats don't talk about kitchen table issues - it's that voters don't make decisions from policy platforms & speeches - they form impressions from "random tidbits absorbed from a propaganda-filled media environment."
newrepublic.com/article/2023...
🚨It's finally here!🚨
AAPOR's Taskforce on 2024 Pre-Election Polling report is out!

Full report: /https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AAPOR-Task-Force-on-2024-Pre-Election-Polling_Report.pdf

Executive summary: aapor.org/wp-content/u...
aapor.org

Ah, my favorite example for undergrads on why you look like a douche when you plagiarize.

Maybe a good lesson for the current AI moment too!

m.youtube.com/watch?v=1s0h...

Reposted by Josh Pasek

HE. FUCKING. KNEW. FOR. YEARS.

My comments to the Michigan Daily on what to make of being added to the "Professor Watchlist."
UMich Professors react to Turning Point USA’s Professor Watchlist
Turning Point USA’s Professor Watchlist lists 30 University of Michigan professors. Gaining popularity following Charlie Kirk's death.
www.michigandaily.com

Wondering about the dispute? Watch the full Reagan radio address here:
Here's the full radio address from Reagan in 1987.

He talks a little about how he needs to impose tariffs on semiconductors from Japan but it's clear he's singling them out as something that should be rarely used.

The Reagan Foundation suggesting they might sue over the ad is hilarious.
President Reagan's Radio Address on Free and Fair Trade on April 25, 1987
YouTube video by Reagan Library
youtu.be
"Such is their fear of jail, bankruptcy or reprisal, that most people I spoke to insisted on anonymity. This was in spite of the fact that many of the same people said Trump would only be restrained by powerful voices standing up to him." My Weekend FT essay. Please read it. on.ft.com/4hqblpr
The Trump Supremacy
[FREE TO READ] Opponents in disarray, allies in line, followers enthralled — the US president is already on his way to building a new world order
on.ft.com

Reposted by Josh Pasek

Here's the full radio address from Reagan in 1987.

He talks a little about how he needs to impose tariffs on semiconductors from Japan but it's clear he's singling them out as something that should be rarely used.

The Reagan Foundation suggesting they might sue over the ad is hilarious.
President Reagan's Radio Address on Free and Fair Trade on April 25, 1987
YouTube video by Reagan Library
youtu.be

The most telling thing about the whole ballroom incident is that Trump believes the only cost anyone could possibly be concerned about is the dollars they personally would be spending.

History, tradition, lives, self-worth, environmental, opportunity costs … none of these.