Carl Henrik Knutsen
@chknutsen.bsky.social
5.9K followers 430 following 110 posts

Political science professor, University of Oslo; Research group leader, CIR group; Researcher, PRIO; co-PI, V-Dem

Political science 57%
Sociology 20%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
govpritzker.illinois.gov
I will not back down.

Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power.

What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?
Donald Trump Truth Social Post: Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also.
simonhix.bsky.social
An excellent (although deeply depressing) piece by Thomas Edsall, with some great interviews with top US political scientists.
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/o...
Opinion | Trump Is Not Afraid of Civil War. Neither Is Stephen Miller.
www.nytimes.com
justinwolfers.bsky.social
Step 1: Cut funding for food stamps
Step 2: Stop measuring hunger
Step 3: There's no evidence cuts to food stamps led to a rise in hunger
www.wsj.com/economy/trum...
www.wsj.com
justinwolfers.bsky.social
Critical part of the President's new $100,000 charge for H1-B visas: The Administration can also offer a $100,000 discount to any person, company, or industry that it wants. Replacing rules with arbitrary discretion.

Want visas? You know who to call and who to flatter.
maks23.bsky.social
🇦🇱 Albania's AI minister "Diella" addressed the parliament for the first time.

👀 Diella said she has been "hurt" by opposition lawmakers who called her unconstitutional.
gtconway.bsky.social
Cowards. Shameless, morally bankrupt cowards.
popovaprof.bsky.social
Let’s go with the idea that these drones over Poland mistakenly ended up there. All the more reason for NATO to announce a no-fly-zone over Western Ukraine in order to prevent such unfortunate mistakes in the future. Simple. Close the skies.
popovaprof.bsky.social
For the love of democracy, STOP using "colour revolution" as a slur!! The colour revolutions were real, enthusiastic, domestic social mobilizations against corruption and electoral fraud. The claim that they were malign outside interference is literal russian propaganda.

chknutsen.bsky.social
Big congratulations, Amalie!!
andycraig.bsky.social
Ezra Klein is right and it matters he's saying this. The question is not "funding the government" or "shutting down the government."

It's funding *this* government versus shutting down *this* government. It's not the definite article existing independent of who's in power. It is who's in power.
Opinion | Stop Acting Like This Is Normal
www.nytimes.com
phillipspobrien.bsky.social
One of the most remarkable things of the last 9 months is how many Americans seem to believe the President is all powerful and Congress has no say.
Actually Congress has been ineffective by choice. It has immense power if it had the courage to use it.

jacobnyrup.bsky.social
I am honored to have been awarded an ERC Starting Grant towards my project "Governing elites since the dawn of modern democracy" (GETGOV).

It allows me to continue to advance this research agenda; the goal is to build a database on governing elites from 1789 and up to today + much more.

#ERCStG
Jacob Nyrup awarded EU funds to research political elites - Department of Political Science
Jacob Nyrup from the Department of Political Science has been granted a substantial 18 million Norwegian kroner by the EU's research council to examine political elites in countries before and after d...
www.sv.uio.no
jacobnyrup.bsky.social
Thank you to everyone who joined us for this year's WhoGov workshop on Political Elites! It is amazing to see so much great research presented on political elites and meet so many great people.

And thank you to @inalkristiansen.bsky.social and @jonaswschmid.bsky.social for co-organizing the event
anjaneundorf.bsky.social
🚨 New publication alert! 🚨
Why do some people keep voting throughout their lives while others drop out? And how do authoritarian elections - even uncompetitive ones- shape citizens’ habits?
Ksenia Northmore-Ball and I tackle these questions in my new paper, now out in @electoralstudies.bsky.social.
jacobnyrup.bsky.social
Trump er ved at forandre USA til det vi i diktaturforskningen kalder for et personalistisk regime. Det er et regime, hvor lederen siger "hop", så er der kun ét svar: "Hvor højt?". Eller hvis lederen siger, at 2+2 = 5, ja, så er den officielle version, at 2+2 altså er lig fem.

1/4
'Thank You President': Cabinet Meeting Turns Reality TV | The One Where They ALL Just Praised Trump
YouTube video by Mint
www.youtube.com

chknutsen.bsky.social
Intervjuet i Aftenposten: Det ser dessverre bare verre og verre ut i USA. Mellomvalget blir nøkkelen for om det amerikanske demokratiet overlever Trump, tror jeg. (Og det kommer ikke til å bli et vanlig mellomvalg)

www.aftenposten.no/verden/i/93R...
Er Trump i ferd med å knekke det amerikanske demokratiet?
– Jeg gir det 50/50 sjanse til å overleve Donald Trump, sier ekspert.
www.aftenposten.no
haakongjerlw.bsky.social
Introducing the Opposition Movements and Groups Dataset 1789–2019 in @cpsjournal.bsky.social together with @mariannedahl.bsky.social @chknutsen.bsky.social @sirianned.bsky.social @hannefjelde.bsky.social @torewig.bsky.social

Read about the paper👇

Or dive right into the data👉 www.prio.org/data/39

chknutsen.bsky.social
I sincerely second this point! Thank you so much, everyone!!
mariannedahl.bsky.social
🔑 Key findings:
• Nonviolent campaigns are more likely to foster democratization after 1900— but outcomes depend on who participates and what they want.
• Students, workers & intellectuals drive democratic change.
• Peasants, middle classes & militaries usually don’t.
mariannedahl.bsky.social
We show:
• OMG covers pro-democracy, anti-liberal & pro-regime campaigns.
• Social bases are diverse—no group dominates > 1/8 of movements.
• Ideologies shifted: nationalism, conservatism, liberalism → socialism → democracy & human rights, with nationalism constant.
mariannedahl.bsky.social
📊 New dataset and paper alert!
We’re proud to launch the Opposition Movements and Groups (OMG) Dataset, 1789–2019: a global dataset covering 1,452 mass mobilization movements. It was just published in Comparative Political Studies. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Below follows a 🧵
mclem.org
This is a real photograph of Washington, DC this week, where the United States president has ordered military occupation in peacetime, and ordered the display of colossal portraits of himself.

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
Washington, DC under military occupation in last August 2025, with banners proclaiming the absolute power of the primus inter pares
vdeminstitute.bsky.social
Download “Global Trends and Expert Perceptions: Pessimism and the Assessment of Democratic Backsliding”: v-dem.net/media/public...
By @kailmarkvart.bsky.social, @danpemstein.com , Brigitte Seim, John Gerring, @chknutsen.bsky.social, and Yunus Orhan
#Democracy #ExpertCodedData #DemocracyData
6(6)
v-dem.net
kailmarkvart.bsky.social
Sidenote: Elsewhere colleagues (incl @acrowinghen.bsky.social , @medzihorsky.bsky.social, @danpemstein.com, @chknutsen.bsky.social, @silindberg.bsky.social) and I find little evidence that bad-vibes among V-Dem’s country experts drive the recent global democratic decline.
doi.org/10.1017/S104...
Abstract: During the past decade, analyses drawing on several democracy measures have shown a global trend of democratic retrenchment. While these democracy measures use radically different methodologies, most partially or fully rely on subjective judgments to produce estimates of the level of democracy within states. Such projects continuously grapple with balancing conceptual coverage with the potential for bias (Munck and Verkuilen 2002; Przeworski et al. 2000). Little and Meng (L&M) (2023) reintroduce this debate, arguing that “objective” measures of democracy show little evidence of recent global democratic backsliding. By extension, they posit that time-varying expert bias drives the appearance of democratic retrenchment in measures that incorporate expert judgments. In this article, we engage with (1) broader debates on democracy measurement and democratic backsliding, and (2) L&M’s specific data and conclusions.